Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s phone call around November 2015 to B in the vicinity of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and Defendant A did not drive a witness as a witness.

The testimony was asked to be "........."

Accordingly, around 16:00 on November 10, 2015, B, at the Seoul Central District Court 408, located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court 157, the above court 2014 and 5332, which were not specified in the indictment against the defendant, but did not interfere with the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, additionally stated matters necessary to specify the case to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's exercise of right to defense.

After attending and taking an oath as a witness of a case such as violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), a substitute driver has driven the parking lot, and A has not driven the parking lot.

“At the time of testimony contrary to one’s memory,” the testimony was presented to the effect that “.”

Accordingly, the defendant caused B to give false testimony and abetted B to give perjury.

2. Defendant B, at around 16:00 on November 10, 2015, was present at the Seoul Central District Court 408, a witness of the above road traffic law violation (dacting driving), etc. at the court of Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court 157 at the center of Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, as a witness, and took an oath, and thereafter testified, the counsel’s “whether a substitute engineer driven until parking at the hotel parking lot.”

As to the question "," the prosecutor's "by proxy" means the "by proxy," and the prosecutor's "by proxy, anywhere driving," needs to be reported to the public prosecutor.

The answer was made to the question of “A parking lot ...”.

However, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was unable to memory who was driving at the time of entering the parking lot, and A was driving from around the hotel to the parking lot.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The witness A’s legal statement (defendant B)

1. Each of the Defendants’ names.