logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.29 2017고단261
위증
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 261]

1. On March 8, 2016, around 17:15, Defendant A appeared at the court of Seoul Central District Court 408, the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 157, the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 408, for Defendant B, and took an oath as a witness of a violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act (No. 3277), and gave testimony following the testimony, whether Defendant A, as of March 8, 2016, was led to the prosecutor’s 1/1, giving a chance to customers at the time.

Neither “I” nor “I” for any question.

ii)“At the time of their service” and, during that period, whether there has been any kind of her past (the period during which she serves).

There shall be no "in respect of the question".

(C) The witness, on the day of this case, has complied with the following: (3) The witness, who is a witness, has been sing on the day of this case.

The term "in response to the question" is the situation where the question was left at that time, and thus, it is essential to recover the question.

However, at the time, the Defendant had been working as an employee in D’s singing room, and had been working in D’s singing room before that day, and had been able to get a customer.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. Defendant B, around March 24, 2015, was a prisoner of war in Gangnam-gu Seoul, who was subject to a substitutional investigation before the police station in Gangnam-gu, Seoul. The Defendant would be good if he was aware of it.

There is no evidence that there is only alcoholic beverage and that there is no evidence, and it is necessary to see to the extent that there is a need to do so.

“In response to the statement, A made a statement to the effect that “it was not true that he reversed the existing statement and did not have any objection” and asked A to the effect that the statement was “.”

On March 2016, the Defendant made a telephone call to A before attending as a witness of a violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act, No. 3277, and then requested A to the same purport.

Accordingly, A around March 8, 2016, around 17:15, at the Seoul Central District Court 408, which is located in 157, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul.

arrow