logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.08 2016고단9071
위증
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, and imprisonment for eight months.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. While Defendant B’s perjury teacher was working as the manager of the F building in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, the Defendant found the “H” restaurant operated by G in the second floor of the F building on March 27, 2015, and demanded G to pay rent and maintenance expenses, and the Defendant was prosecuted for interference with business due to the fact that he had expressed sound and expressed desire to do so, and was tried to have the Defendant A, an employee of the above restaurant, who observed the scene of interference with business, made a false statement.

On July 2015, the Defendant prepared a written statement to reverse A who prepared and submitted the written statement on March 27, 2015, stating that “the Defendant found the said restaurant and took a bath to the said restaurant,” and that “The Defendant will give KRW 1 million per week on the day.”

In other words, after receiving the written statement on July 8, 2015, the Defendant sent KRW 1,00,000 to A through the account of his relative I around July 11, 2015, stating that “The Defendant has no desire or sound in the restaurant in question.”

Defendant 1 even thereafter until August 2016, 2016, Defendant A had no sound in favor of B.

A made a request for testimony to the effect that “......” made a false statement to A.

Accordingly, A around August 9, 2016, around 15:20 on August 9, 2016, at the Seoul Central District Court 408, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court 157, the above court 2015, and the defendant 2724, was present as a witness to take an oath and to testify.

A The prosecutor's "I" found the defendant B in the H restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul on March 27, 2015 in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and had a sound.

Neither “I” nor “I” for any question.

The Prosecutor stated “Is the Prosecutor’s “Is a large amount of interest or might not do so at any time.”

In relation to the question “,” “I do not seem to have any doubt, desire, or large amount.”

“....”

arrow