A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with one’s denial B, is a person who was engaged in an agency business for purchase of overseas master goods through the Internet B.

On July 24, 2017, the Defendant reported an advertisement that the Defendant may purchase overseas scenic items through the above blogs, and agreed to purchase the overseas scenic items, such as clothes or bags, at prices higher than the department stores of the United States secured by the Defendant, and directly deliver them to the buyers of the Republic of Korea recruited by the victim, and to left their middle strings. From that point of time, from that point of time, the Defendant transferred the purchase price of overseas scenic items, such as bags, from the customer recruited by the victim through the Internet blogs to the E Bank Deposit Account (Account Number:F) in the name of the Defendant, the purchase price of the overseas scenic items, which was deducted from the customer recruited by the victim through the Internet blogs, was remitted to G, an overseas scenic purchasing agent, and the victim directly purchased the overseas scenic items ordered by the victim, and had G engage in the transaction directly delivering them to the victim’s customer’s address.

On the other hand, when around August 25, 2017, it is impossible to purchase and deliver goods requested by the customers due to the circumstances of G, a foreign buying agent of the defendant, etc., so it is no longer possible to mediate the purchase of overseas goods as agreed upon with the victim, and the price of goods transferred to G by receiving a request for the purchase from the other customers as well as the victim, was returned to the victim. As such, it was no longer possible to mediate the purchase of overseas goods as agreed with the victim, and the price of goods transferred to G by receiving a request for the purchase agency from the victim was returned to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on September 2017, did not explain the above situation to the victim and went back to a foreign country on the same route as above.