beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 8, 2015, the Defendant against the victim B calls the victim B at the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu-gu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, to the effect that “A private village Do Do Do Do Do ri import overseas printed articles from this Dogri and deliver articles to editing stores, etc., so that the Defendant may purchase money at a price lower than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that at the time of transfer of money.”
However, the defendant did not work related to the importation of a well-known product, and the defendant did not have the intent or ability to purchase a bratization to the victim even if he received money from the injured party because he planned to use the money from the injured party as a cost of living.
Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received 2,649,000 won in total from the victim on seven occasions from September 3, 2015, including from the time he received transfer of 279,000 won to the account under the name of the Defendant for the same day as the price for physical exercise on the same day from the victim, and received 2,649,000 won in total from the victim on seven occasions, such as the list of crimes in attached Table (1).
2. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant against the victim D calls the victim D at the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu-gu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, to the effect that “In this case, the Defendant would have purchased overseas masters from the Ethicalian to deliver articles to editing stores, etc., so that he/she may purchase money at a price lower than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that higher than that at the time of transfer of money.”
However, the defendant did not work related to the importation of a well-known product, and the defendant did not have the intent or ability to purchase a bratization to the victim even if he received money from the injured party because he planned to use the money from the injured party as a cost of living.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is the same as the victim.