logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2012.11.23 2012고단610
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On June 24, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Gwangju District Court on September 22, 2010 and completed the execution of the above punishment.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant forged private document: (a) opened a cell phone in the name of B (the male, the age of 17, the probation of the Juvenile Department on February 8, 2012) and C (the suspension of prosecution on February 28, 2012) and opened a cell phone in the name of C (the suspension of prosecution on February 28, 2012) that he/she became aware of at the time of the skin; and (b) opened a cell phone in the name of the above B, he/she deducted only the core chip from the cell, affixed it to another device; and (c) opened

On September 19, 201, the Defendant, along with the above B and C, prepared two copies of the above application form with the name of D written in the column of each contractor in Chapter II of the mobile phone entrance application form, without authority, as if the Defendant had obtained permission from the above D, for the purpose of exercising the cross-disactive telephone agency located in the B and Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B and C, forged two copies of a mobile phone application in the name of D, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations.

2. At the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant submitted two copies of the forged mobile phone accession application with B and C as well as those of the above agency employees who are not aware of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B and C, held two copies of the above investigation document.

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant using the aforementioned investigation document at the time, place, as described in paragraph (1) together with B and C, filed an application for the above forged mobile phone admission, and set up a fixed rate of KRW 842,00 with employees of the above mobile phone agency and the mobile phone user fee at KRW 842,00,00, and the mobile phone user fee at KRW 61,440,00, respectively. The Defendant received two mobile phone units of the E and the F mobile phone (the mobile phone model M250KW) and used it for about one month, and paid KRW 1,806,880,00 for the total amount of the mobile installment and the mobile phone use fee.

arrow