Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person running “C” in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 2014.

1. On August 8, 2014, the Defendant in breach of trust received from the victim D’s request for termination of subscription to the mobile phone from the victim D and received from the victim E’s mobile phone one, there was a duty to immediately proceed with the termination procedure.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not terminate the above numbers in violation of his duties and used the cellular phone directly by the Defendant, thereby imposing KRW 500,980 on the victim.

As a result, the Defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to the above communication cost, and suffered damages equivalent to the same amount as the victim.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. A. Around August 2014, the Defendant entered “D” and “F” in the applicant’s column with a black pen in the application form for the subscription of KT mobile phone, and signed D on the name following the applicant’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a copy of the mobile phone entry application in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The defendant 2-A

At the time, place, as described in the subsection, one copy of the application for subscription to the KT mobile phone in the name of the company, which is not aware of the forgery, was sent to the employee in the name of the company.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the above mobile phone entrance application in the name of forged D.

3. Around August 2014, the Defendant submitted one copy of the application for subscription to the KT mobile phone in the name of D in the same manner as the foregoing paragraph 2, to the staff in charge of the name in charge of the KT mobile phone, Inc.

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay the fee normally even if he was provided with mobile telephone services from KT, which is the victim, because the defendant forged the above D's name and shipped the application for subscription.

Nevertheless, the defendant has opened and used D's G from KT for the settlement of the victim's losses.