beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 8,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A’s obstruction of the performance of official duties, Defendant A, and Defendant B are those working as the same in the RusWnsh.
At around 00:30 on August 23, 2014, the Defendants: (a) on the 6th line of the Bank of Korea in the center of the Seo-gu regular course of business, and (b) on the 6th line of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, the Defendants were trying to take the patrol vehicle in order to transfer E, a driver, to the traffic accident processing department of the Seo-gu Police Station, who is a police officer G, H, I, I, and J, a driver of the Seo-gu Police Station, who was dispatched to the site, while driving the said place.
Accordingly, Defendant A set off the back of the patrol police officer with the desire of “this sprinke, Y Y, and Nease start to live in her country on the basis of the same kind.” The above police officer’s joint arms and arms are tightly cut off, cut off, cut off, cut off the chest of the above police officer’s H, cut down both arms, cut off, cut off, cut off the arms of the above police officer’s Ha, cut off the shoulder of the above police officer’s knife, sealed the above police officer’s knife, sealed the above police officer’s shoulder to the above police officer for two weeks of medical treatment, and thereby, the Defendant assaulted the above police officer’s knife the knife of the knife that requires two weeks’s right-hand medical treatment, and interfered with the above police officer’s legitimate treatment of the knife during two weeks of criminal investigation, and the above police officer’s legitimate treatment of the knife.
2. Defendant B’s obstruction of the performance of official duties was committed by the police officers on the date, time, and place of the foregoing paragraph (1) above, and the police officers attempted to arrest A in the act of committing an offense of obstruction of the performance of official duties, and committed assault by the police officers on the part of the police officers, such as “Chewing feasia”, and booming the said police officers G by hand, pushing the said police officers’ chests of the said police officers I, pushing the said police officers’ shoulders of the J.
3. The defendant A’s damage to public goods is the same as the above paragraph 1.