1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:00 on May 5, 2019, the Defendant: (a) pursuant to Dtel E in which C had been living together with the Defendant in the region where C was residing, the Defendant: (b) pursuant to the instant food blade, the victim F (55 years of age) who was in motion with C was found to have been in motion with C and opened a door to the said officetel; and (c) pursuant to the fact that C had been in motion with C, the victim F (5 years of age) was in motion with C and opened the door to the said officetel, the Defendant threatened the victim’s part of the knife, which was a dangerous thing (30cm in total length, 17cm in length in knife). As the end of the said food knife, the Defendant knife knife knife knife knif

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness F and C’s legal statement;

1. Statement by the prosecution against C;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on internal investigation, on-site photographs;

1. One copy of a report on investigation (voluntary submission of Curphones), written consent to voluntary submission, written issuance of a seizure list, written confirmation as to whether to witness, and written confirmation of receipt; and

1. One copy of the investigation report (C mobile mobile siren analysis result), one copy of the results of the mobile siren analysis, and one CD;

1. In light of the investigation report (Submission of Suspect F diagnosis report), diagnosis report (which is inconsistent with each other, C makes a statement to the effect that the statement corresponds to the facts charged consistently from the second investigation of the police, and C makes a false statement to the effect that it is consistent with the facts charged from the second investigation of the police, and C made a false statement to the effect that it was consistent with the facts charged, and C changed its mind and made a statement to the police two times after the second investigation of the police, and in light of the victim's written statement (in 9 pages of investigation records), there is credibility, and considering the victim's consistent statement of damage et al., it can be sufficiently recognized that the facts of the crime as stated in the judgment of the Defendant are consistent with the victim F

1. Article 258-2 (1) or 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Consideration of favorable sentencing factors among “the grounds for two sentences” below)

1. Probation;