logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.04.23 2019고합242
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

Seized evidence 1 to 4 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 12, 2019, the defendant accepted a proposal that he will transport one of a package of a trip to Korea, which contains a penphone from a person who is in the name of the defendant on December 12, 2019, to offer a price in the face of the week.

On December 14, 2019, the Defendant: (a) sent from a person who was not registered in his name; (b) divided a total of 83 vinyls into 83 vinyls; (c) deposited a bank for travel of approximately 4.32 kg of merpter (one name hereinafter referred to as “propon”), which was concealed by camper in 3 punishments; and (d) boarded cuber for travel of approximately 4.32 kg of Malaysia as air freight; and (e) boarded cuber Cuburf Furt B on December 14, 2019 and arrived at the port of Jeju provision.

Therefore, although the defendant is not a person handling narcotics, he imported psychotropic drugs from Malaysia to the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Seizure records;

1. Each written appraisal (No. 15, 17 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. As a result of the mobile forensic analysis, the application of the monetary list, and the message details legislation;

1. Article 58 (1) 6, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Establishment of Relevant Acts and the Selection of Narcotics, Etc. concerning Criminal Facts (Selection of Imprisonment for a limited term);

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under the main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Confiscated Narcotics

1. The summary of the argument was the Jeju International Airport for the purpose of travel, and the defendant was unaware of whether there was a philopon in the bank by his request, on the following day because there was a large number of friendship C having to arrive at the Jeju International Airport for the purpose of travel.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted by this Court, the Defendant, with the knowledge of the fact that philophones are contained in the body of the court below, to transport the philophones.

arrow