The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On September 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 00:10 on September 17, 2017, at the Defendant’s house located in Young-gu apartment B apartment unit C, Young-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si; (b) performed drinking with her husband, her husband, her husband, and her husband-friendly job offers D; and (c) carried out games with her husband

When the Defendant was found to have sexual intercourse under the agreement between D and a small room, the Defendant was sexually abused from D.

I tried to file a complaint.

On September 17, 2017, the Defendant submitted a written complaint stating that “At the time, the Defendant was sexual assaulted against D, for the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment on September 17, 2017 at the Southern Police Station of the Gyeonggi-gu, Suwon-si, the Young-gu, Seoul, with the aim of having D perform drinking at the Defendant’s house on September 17, 2017, and then having D drinking. The Defendant was forced to engage in sexual assault with D, for the purpose of having D undergo criminal punishment. At the same day, the Defendant submitted a written complaint stating that “I was off the Defendant,” and the Defendant was investigated by the victim at the above police station on the same day, and was subject to the victim’s investigation at the E police station affiliated with the above police station, “I were under the influence of drinking, but D was under the influence of drinking without having to open a small room, and forced sexual intercourse with D to close it.

“The fact, however, was sexually in agreement with D.”

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts to public offices and made a false accusation.

2. The summary of the Defendant’s assertion was not a sexual intercourse under D’s agreement, but a sexual assault was committed from D, because the Defendant was unable to memory the situation at the time of sexual intercourse with D.

I think that the complaint of this case was reached, and that it was not a false report on D, nor a false report on D.

3. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

① On December 2014, Defendant and F began with the same company, a person who is not the same company, and completed the marriage report on April 17, 2017.

The defendant and F are approximately 82 square meters of supplied area.