A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

Around 08:04 on March 9, 2017, the Defendant reported 112 to the effect that “I were sexual assaulted to the male male male male male female female juvenile and the office located in the same Si/Gun/Gu,” and stated to the effect that, around 23:15 on the same day, I would be subject to punishment for G and his/her car at the F School parking lot located in the same Si/Gun/Gu, on March 9, 2017.”

However, since G had sexual intercourse under the agreement with the defendant at the time, G did not have raped the defendant.

As a result, the defendant committed a criminal punishment against G for the purpose of having G receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Part of the prosecutor's statement protocol concerning H;

1. Photographss of CCTV images and dynamic images to take a course, such as photographs and Kakao Stockholm dialogues;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that he/she was forced to sexual assault from G, and that he/she did not dismiss G as described in the instant facts charged.

In light of the following circumstances, the Defendant and G have been aware from around 2015 to this court, and G consistently stated that the Defendant and G had sexual intercourse within the Tluri vehicle under the agreement of the Defendant, and did not have sexual intercourse with the Defendant as alleged by the Defendant, and that it did not have sexual intercourse with the Defendant as alleged by the Defendant. The circumstances leading up to the sexual intercourse with the Defendant and the surrounding and following circumstances are specific and consistent.