logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.10.31 2013고단6498
배타적경제수역에서의외국인어업등에대한주권적권리의행사에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by each fine of KRW 50 million, Defendant C, D, E, F, and G, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as the mate of an 1 (35 tons, steel boats), a two-boatd vessel of low-powered fishing vessels, A is in charge of operating navigation equipment and operating fishing gear while assisting the captain at the time of fishing activities. Defendant B is a captain of J (35 tons, steel boats) who is a subordinate vessel of low-powered fishing vessels and takes charge of operating vessel engine equipment while assisting the captain at the time of fishing activities and operating fishing gear and net equipment at the time of fishing activities. Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Defendant G, as the crew of the above subordinate vessel, are engaged in the operation of vessel engine equipment and operating fishing gear and net equipment at the time of fishing activities.

Where any foreigner intends to conduct fishery activities in an exclusive economic zone other than a specific prohibited zone, he/she shall obtain permission therefor from the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.

Nevertheless, at around 13:00 on September 1, 2013, the Defendants loaded one of the low net fishing gear in the above vessel from the port of Madong-si, China, China. At around 13:00, the Defendants left the above vessel by making the vessel on board the vessel, six of the vessel on board the vessel, seven of the vessel on board the vessel on board the vessel, and at around 13:00 of the same month, the appeal of Incheon Spojin-gun, which was 41 Ethm (N 37.16 minutes in north latitude and 124.06 minutes in northwest-gu, Incheon, the exclusive economic zone of the Republic of Korea on the 29th 13:00 of the same month. At the 41st eth eth eth 16th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth from the above date to 15:41 of the above vessel.

Accordingly, Defendants conspired to conduct fishery activities in the exclusive economic zone without permission from the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The details of arrest, arrest, and arrest situation;

Each photograph, each investigation reporting statute shall apply

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime: Each exclusive provision;

arrow