logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.01.10 2017구합62137
수용재결취소등
Text

1. The defendant,

A. Each of the money stated in the “increased Compensation” column in the attached Table 1 attached hereto to Plaintiffs B, AG, AH, AI, AJ, and AK and each of them.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) project approval and public notice - Housing redevelopment project (AL district Housing Redevelopment Project) - AM announced at Ansan-si on December 6, 2010, AO announced at Ansan-si on September 12, 2013, and AO announced at Ansan-si on December 24, 2014: Defendant;

B. Adjudication on expropriation made by the local Land Tribunal of Gyeonggi-do on December 26, 2016 - Land, buildings, obstacles (hereinafter “instant expropriation”): Compensation for losses: The amount indicated in the attached Table 2 “total amount of compensation for expropriation” in the attached Table 1: - Additional charges for delay: 20% per annum for the period from the date on which 60 days have elapsed from the date on which a request for adjudication on expropriation was made to September 30, 2015 for the above compensation for losses until September 30, 2015 for the period from October 1, 2015 to the date on which a request for adjudication on expropriation was made, and the amount indicated in the “additional charges for expropriation” in the attached Table 1, which is calculated annually by 15% for the period from October 1, 2015 to the date on which a request for adjudication on expropriation was made -

The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on August 24, 2017 (hereinafter “instant ruling”) - Compensation for losses: The amount recorded in the column for “total amount of compensation for objection” in attached Table 1, the Plaintiff, C, D, E, F, G, H, AF, AF, H, AH, and AK as of August 24, 2017; the remainder of the Plaintiffs shall be dismissed: (i) delay additional charges; (ii) Plaintiff A, C, D, E, F, G, H, AF, AF, AH, AH, and K from the date on which the request for expropriation ruling was made to September 30, 2015; (iii) the period from October 1, 2015 to the date on which the request for expropriation ruling was made; (iv) the amount recorded in attached Table 1 by 15% per annum; and (v) the appraisal corporation and the remainder of the appraisal appraisal corporation (hereinafter “the appraisal corporation”) shall be dismissed; and (iv) the appraisal corporation and the new appraisal corporation (the appraisal corporation”) shall be dismissed.

D. The above appraiser below the result of the appraiser AP's appraisal is "court appraiser" and the result of the appraisal is as follows.

arrow