1. The defendant shall pay the respective money and each of the above money stated in the attached Form 2 to the plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, and F.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public announcement - Q housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Public announcement of Seongdong-gu on August 10, 2007, the RR publicly announced on October 4, 2007, the Seongdong-gu Public Notification on February 21, 2008, T, the Seongdong-gu Public Notification on October 22, 2009, the Seongdong-gu Public Notification on November 17, 201, the Seongdong-gu Public Notification on November 17, 201, the WW on June 28, 2012, and the Seongdong-gu Public Notification on November 28, 2013: the Defendant.

B. The adjudication of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City on October 24, 2014 - The object of expropriation: The attached Table 1 [Attachment 1] owned by the plaintiffs in the instant project area - Each land and its ground obstacles - Compensation amount stated in the attached Table 1 [Attachment 1] - The adjudication amount for delay additional dues: The adjudication on delay damages was reserved on the ground that the aforementioned expropriation committee needs to review the additional legal principles.

- Commencement date of expropriation: December 12, 2014

The adjudication of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City on December 19, 2014 - Additional dues: The amount stated in the attached Table 2 in the "additional dues on expropriation" column - The starting date of expropriation: February 6, 2015.

In February 26, 2016, the Central Land Expropriation Committee (the Central Land Expropriation Committee) sought a calculation of the additional charges for delay due to the Defendant’s delay from the date after 60 days elapsed from the date on which the Plaintiffs’ claim for adjudication, which was not the end of the period for cash settlement, was rejected on the ground that if the consultation period expires after the request for adjudication, the additional charges for delay should be calculated from the day after the expiration of the consultation period until

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The lower court erred in the lower judgment on the acceptance of additional charges against the Plaintiffs’ assertion. As such, the Defendant’s justifiable delay charges and additional charges for the acceptance of the appeal are the difference between the Plaintiffs’ justifiable delay charges and the delayed payment charges.