logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2020.12.11 2020누11724
영업정지처분취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of

(2) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was examined as a ground for appeal, is not significantly different from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance court, and all of the evidence presented in the first instance court, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable).

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow