2020Nu11724 Revocation of the disposition of business suspension

A

The District Education Office of Gwangju Metropolitan City

Attorney Kim In-bok, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

Gwangju District Court Decision 2020Guhap10937 Decided August 13, 2020

November 13, 2020

December 11, 2020

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. On November 4, 2019, the defendant revoked the suspension of teaching for 15 days against the plaintiff.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning of the court's explanation on this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the contents asserted by the plaintiff as the grounds for appeal in this court are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence presented to the first instance court are examined, the judgment of

2. Conclusion

The plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

Judge Choi Jong-chul

Judges Yang Young-hee

Judge Park Jong-hun