logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2021.02.05 2020누11496
시정명령처분취소 청구의 소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal are the judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court cites this case as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the contents asserted by the plaintiff on the grounds of appeal in this court are not significantly different from those asserted by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence presented in the first instance court and this court are examined, the court 1's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is legitimate). 2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just based on its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow