A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

C As of June 30, 2017, D = 32.9% of D as of June 30, 2017, D is designated as a public institution by the Republic of Korea as one of six subsidiaries holding 100% equity shares, and is playing an important role in E’s power supply and demand as a company that pays 4.16 billion won and 5,85.1 billion won as of 2016. The president of C is involved in the contract entered into by C (a service contract for the maintenance of driving remuneration: KRW 360 billion; a service contract for the construction of power plant: KRW 230 billion; a fuel import contract; KRW 3.10 billion; KRW 10 billion; KRW 200,000; KRW 20,000; and KRW 3.10,016; and KRW 3G; and KRW 385.1 billion.

The president of the above C shall be appointed by the president through the recommendation committee of the board of directors as a candidate for the recommendation of the president through document review and interview. If the recommendation committee of the board of directors appointed three persons in the order of priority as a candidate for the recommendation of the president, the president shall be appointed by the president through the recommendation of the Minister of Industry and Trade. The interview shall be conducted in four categories of sound ethical awareness, such as the ability to present easily and vision, ② knowledge and experience related to the electric utility industry, ③ organization management and management ability, ④ integrity, ④ integrity, etc., and ④ The six president recommendation committee members (the chairperson: J: K, M, N, N, andO) shall be composed of up to 25 points for each item of evaluation; the total of 10 points shall be given to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4 second, 4 second, and 5th order of priority determined by the above combined points; and the results shall be calculated by submitting the evaluation table to the relevant employees in the order of priority evaluation.

The defendant is a planning director in P, who has been held from September 2016 to October 2016, has been in charge of the secretariat of the recommendation committee of executive officers, and has been in charge of the support affairs of the committee of executive officers, such as the progress of meetings and resolutions, and the preparation of minutes.