The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On November 21, 2016, the Defendant was present at the Seoul Southern District Court 308, Seoul Southern District Court 386, which was located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, as a witness of a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. against 3629, 2016, the above court, as a witness, and tried to do so.

Defendant C before the above court in the trial of the above case: ① I do not answer the prosecutor’s question, “A witness, at the above D Magaz establishment around 00:30 on April 28, 2016, has observed the administration of the instant case by means of inserting phiphones into a single-use injection machine and dilution with water to the Defendant’s arms.”

The answer to the question of the prosecutor’s “I cannot see the witness”; ② The answer to the question of the prosecutor’s “I see the witness”; ③ There is no witness to the questions of the prosecutor’s “I see the case”;

At the same time, we have observed the fact that two persons are being a chain, and that they continued to sing back because they came back again, and they came back again.

4. According to E, the defendant puts a phiphone into a folder in the body of a witness, puts water into a folder, and injected with a folder.

the prosecutor’s question, “ whatever needs”, and “I do not have this time.”

“The answer” and 5 “E” witnessed that the Defendant had administered a philophone at the time of the witness.

the prosecutor’s question, “no fact has been administered”.

6.3 6.3 6. 6. 6.

the prosecutor’s question, “no fact has been administered”.

7 The question of the attorney-at-law called “I do not have the Defendant any time,” “I do not have the Defendant,” which read, “I do not go to the house when I would like to go to the house when I would like to go to the house, or I would like to go to the Defendant, and what I would like to go to.”

I do not want to go to go to the house, and do so. I do am in the house, and we am continuously eating.