Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against Defendant A is publicly announced.

Public Prosecutor's Office

1. On December 13, 2016, Defendant A appeared at the court of Suwon District Court No. 410, 120, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2016, as a witness of the instant case of violation of the Narcotics Control Act (hereinafter “instant case”) against 6474 E (hereinafter “the instant case”).

The Defendant’s defense counsel’s “Written questioning that the Defendant purchased a penphone from B on February 7, 2016” refers to the Defendant’s defense counsel’s “Is this fact at the risk of solicitation.”

The testimony, “B,” and the testimony to “B,” to the question “W,” “I cannot see that the Defendant sold philophones,” and to the question “B, I would like to make several calls to the Defendant in order to contact with the witness,” and the prosecutor’s continued to “I would like to have the Defendant sell philophones to the Defendant, and there is no fact that B had been in dispute with B.

“To have sold philophones” to the question “

There is no fact that there was no dispute or dispute.

As we did not pay money, we testified that it was less satisfy in dispute.”

However, in fact, the defendant knew that he purchased phiphonephones from E, and asked E to administer phiphones, and he was aware that E had a philogram scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. On December 13, 2016, Defendant B appeared as a witness in the Suwon District Court No. 410 of the Suwon District Court No. 120, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 14:00, which was 120, and the above court’s order No. 6474 E as a witness of the violation of the Narcotics Control Act against the above court’s order No. 6474.

The Defendant’s witness “I will no question the Defendant’s “I have a fact that philophones are written to the Defendant.”

testimony, "......"