1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The argument that the defendant cited the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance by this court is different from the argument in the court of first instance. Thus, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the evidence added in this court are comprehensively considered.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for adding the arguments emphasized by the defendant in this court and the judgment thereof as seen in paragraph (2), and it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

▣ 제1심판결문 3쪽 위에서 4줄의 ‘1,561,905,640원’을 ‘1,561,905,940원’으로 고쳐 쓴다.

▣ 제1심판결문 3쪽 아래에서 7줄의 ‘서울고등법원 2015나205342호’를 ‘서울고등법원 2015나2053542호’로 고쳐 쓴다.

▣ 제1심판결문 3쪽 아래에서 2줄의 ‘2016. 9. 22.’를 ‘2016. 9. 21.’로 고쳐 쓴다.

▣ 제1심판결문 5쪽 위에서 4~5줄 전부를 ‘[인정 근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제1~3, 6, 10호증, 을 제6, 8~12, 15, 17, 20, 21, 23, 39호증(각 가지번호 있는 것은 가지번호 포함)의 각 기재, 이 법원에 현저한 사실, 변론 전체의 취지’로 고쳐 쓴다.

▣ 제1심판결문 6쪽 위에서 9줄의 ‘갑 제9호증의 1’ 뒤에 ‘갑 제11호증의 2’를 추가한다.

▣ 제1심판결문 7쪽 위에서 6줄의 ‘판단을 하였다.’ 뒤에 ‘이에 대하여 피고가 대법원 2018다237671호로 상고하였으나 대법원은 2018. 9. 13. 피고의 상고를 기각하는 판결을 선고하였고, 별건 소송은 그 무렵 확정되었다.’를 추가한다.

2. As to the Defendant’s assertion at this court

A. On July 11, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant agreement was null and void as a false declaration of conspiracy with the Defendant’s husband, and that on July 11, 2012, the Plaintiff did not have any claim that the Plaintiff would receive from the Plaintiff and D and M operated by the Dong L or L, the birth of which is the birth of the Plaintiff.