1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant and claims extended by the plaintiff in this court are dismissed.

2. Appeal;

1. The plaintiff and the defendant's assertion cited in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance are different from each other as alleged in the court of first instance. Thus, the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the evidence added in this court are

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the plaintiff and the defendant added or emphasized the following parts and stated the allegations and their judgments in the court of first instance, as seen in Articles 2 and 3, and 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(약칭은 제1심판결의 약칭을 그대로 따른다). ▣ 제1심판결문 3쪽 아래에서 1~5줄을 아래와 같이 고쳐 쓴다.

『따라서 피고는 원고에게 청구취지 기재와 같이 고용의 의사표시를 할 의무가 있고, 또한 위와 같이 고용의무가 발생한 이후인 2012. 1.부터 원고가 부당하게 해고당한 무렵인 2016. 4.까지의 미지급 상여금 합계 14,054,405원, 2016. 5.부터 2018. 12.까지 월평균 급여 합계 62,869,216원, 그동안의 상여금 합계 9,065,374원의 합계 85,988,995원과 이에 대한 지연손해금을, 2019. 1. 1.부터 원고가 복직할 때까지 월 2,182,806원(= 월평균 급여 1,964,663원 2019년 월평균 상여금 218,143원)의 비율로 계산한 돈을 지급할 의무가 있다.』 ▣ 제1심판결문 7쪽 위에서 2, 3, 6줄, 9쪽 아래에서 5, 8줄의 각 ‘기본급’을 ‘월평균 급여’로 각 고쳐 쓴다.

▣ 제1심판결문 4쪽 위에서 5줄 앞에 아래 내용을 추가한다.

3. Judgment on the defendant's main defense of safety

A. As to the period of filing a lawsuit and assertion, the Defendant brought a lawsuit with the administrative court within 15 days from the date the Plaintiff was served with a decision on review by the National Labor Relations Commission on December 9, 2016, and the said decision on review became final and conclusive as it was. Accordingly, the Defendant brought a lawsuit on January 20, 2017 after the lapse of 40 days thereafter.