1. The defendant shall state the amount corresponding to the claim amount column of the attached sheet to the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party, respectively.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire argument in Gap evidence No. 1 as to the cause of the claim, the defendant company may recognize that the plaintiff (appointed party) and the selected party entered each of the work days indicated in the attached Table and withdrawn from the completion date, and the defendant company did not receive wages equivalent to the amount claimed in the attached Table, barring any special circumstance, the defendant company is obligated to pay, as requested by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party, the unpaid wages, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum per annum as stipulated in the Labor Standards Act from the 14th day after the retirement date to the date of full payment.

2. The defendant's representative director who judged the defendant's assertion is C and himself is only a representative in the form of lending his name to C. However, the claim in this case is not a claim against the defendant's representative director, but a claim against the defendant's company, and the corporation and the representative director are separate, and the above claim cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.