logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.09.28 2016가단12493
임금 등
Text

1. The Defendant stated in the “amount claimed” column in the attached Table to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointor, respectively, and the corresponding money and the above.

Reasons

1. In addition to the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff (appointed party; hereinafter "the plaintiff") and the remaining designated parties are employed by the defendant to provide labor for each corresponding period and retire from office, but it is recognized that they did not receive each wage as stated in the "request amount" column in the attached Table No. 1.

2. According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff and the remaining designated parties a delay interest calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as stipulated in the Labor Standards Act and the Enforcement Decree of the same Act from the corresponding initial date (the day following the 14th day from the date of retirement) to the day of full payment as to each of the corresponding amounts and each of the above amounts listed in the "request Date" column in the attached Table of the same Table.

(C) The representative director of the defendant is only the representative of the defendant's name, and the defendant's actual representative is D, so the plaintiff's claim is groundless. However, the plaintiff's claim of this case is only a claim against the defendant, and it is not a claim against C, and the above claim is not a claim against the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow