Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act from August 4, 2018 to around 0:50 of the following day, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the Mapo-gu Police Station D police box located in Mapo-gu Seoul, and was taken protective measures for the said police box to be 112 reported, and then the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the said police box, and was under the control of the said police box, and was under the control of the said police box to E and F of the said police box affiliated with the said police box.

너처럼 좃같이 사니깐 좋냐

It was difficult to avoid any disturbance, such as intending to salute F and G with a view to saluting them over several times, such as marching up “.......”

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

2. On August 5, 2018, at around 00:35, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, as described in paragraph 1, committed assault by the police officer, such as assaulting him/her, by drinking him/her, by drinking him/her to water from a police officer, and then spreading him/her to a slope E/her face, and thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties, by assaulting him/her, by drinking him/her, according to the instant item 12, and by spreading him/her to a slope E/herself.

3. On August 5, 2018, at around 00:40 on August 5, 2018, the Defendant damaged public goods, as described in paragraphs (1) and (2), took a disturbance, as the Defendant took the Defendant’s act by photographing the Defendant’s act from a mobile phone for business purposes, and took the Defendant’s act in his/her hand at the same time, thereby cutting off the cell phone cited by the said F.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the use of the mobile phone case of 10,000 won or more at public offices by harming its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from the F phone officer);

1. Investigation report (verification as to whether the mobile phone case in this case is an object for official use);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged mobile phone cases;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of cancellation of the official document), and Article 136 of the Criminal Act.