logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단4436
특수상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violence and special injury [the relationship between the defendant and the victim] is between the victim C (28 years of age) and the workplace partner;

[Specific Crime]

A. On July 2, 2016, at around 23:32, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim, the employee, and the Defendant, and the Defendant’s female-friendly job placement F, who drinks the instant World Cup by damaging the instant World Cup on the floor; (b) was in dispute with G and Si, a workplace member; (c) while the Defendant’s female-friendly job placement F, the Defendant prevented the Defendant; (d) said, the Defendant was carrying the Defendant out of the restaurant, and the Defendant stated, “I will be able to do so by doing so, and I will be able to do so by doing so; and (d) I would see the said victim by leaving the floor; and (e) assaulted the victim, by hand, by harming the victim’s fage.

B. After the completion of fighting as referred to in Paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) entered the Defendant’s residence, Do newsletter, approximately five minutes of clothes, into the Do newsletter, “Y and Dong 605, Do-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, Do-605; (b) was placed in the main machine, which is dangerous articles to defend himself or to threaten the other party in preparation for the occurrence of the case from the workplace rent of the victim, such as the victim, etc.; and (c) moved the victim and workplace rent out of his residence to the place of residence; and (d) moved the said E “E”, where the victim and workplace rent continued to drink.

On the following day, at around 00:08, the Defendant asked the Defendant whether I, a place of work, was “in pursuit of wrapping with the Defendant,” as set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, I asked the Defendant, who was in the middle of the said “E”, “I asked the Defendant,” who was in the middle of the said “E”, was in line with the victim C, and the Defendant was in line with the Defendant, and due to the occurrence of the above I, the part of the Defendant’s lecture was in line with the above I, and the Defendant was in line with the part of the Defendant’s title, including the Defendant.

At this time, the Defendant above.

arrow