Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, and by imprisonment for six months, respectively.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 9, 2016, Defendant A, at the time of Seopopopopo City E, attempted to drink as referred to in F restaurant C and B, but was refused on the ground that it was easy time to drink, Defendant B, at the time following the restaurant’s building, provided a diversology in the following parts of the restaurant building.

As the owner G of the above restaurant building who had been observed, the dispute occurred with the owner G of the above restaurant building, and the police officer I tried to take a camera in order to take a place in which she was placed in her old crym to take a place where she was placed in a police box, which was called upon the 112 report, and the defendant tried to take a camera in order to take a place in which she was placed in her old crym, while keeping the crym in her hand, taken the crym with the crym of the crym, and then divided the crym of the crym, which is equivalent to 2.10,00 won at the market price,

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

2. Defendant A, at around 16:14 on December 9, 2016, who obstructed the Defendants’ performance of their official duties, destroyed the above public goods at the behind the restaurant building as indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, was arrested by the Assistant J of the Seogpo Police Station H department affiliated with the Seopo Police Station H department and the police officer I. As a result, Defendant A, who was able to arrest a flagrant offender by hand, was able to walk up the bridge and walk up the bridge with the police her hand while carrying the her arms by hand. Defendant B, who was accompanied by the aboveJ, was fright up to the tight floor.

Accordingly, the defendant C, who was found to be arrested by the police officer I while leaving the defendants, was able to see the defendant C by cutting the I's clothes and cutting it over the floor, and the defendant B continued to do so by cutting it over the police officer's blick attached to the above I's blick.

In addition, the above J made one time a part of the back head of the J.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the duty of 112 reports filed by police officers and legitimate duty of arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The investigation report and the photograph relating to the case.