logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.01.12 2016고단3130
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 24, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (e.g., after an accident) was under the influence of 0.121% of alcohol concentration in blood around 00:36 on June 24, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle from BA-to-faced, and made it left to the left from the Dogwon distance between the 315 south-gu and south-gu, Incheon. Since it is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, the Defendant had a duty of care to observe the signal and make a safe turn to the left.

Nevertheless, in order to take account of the police vehicles following the Defendant’s annual interest due to the act of violating signal, the Defendant neglected the duty of care as above and neglected the above duty of care, and neglected the left-hand turn in violation of the stop signals, and received the front part of the victim C(44 years old) driving, who was on the right-hand side (the right-hand side) in the direction of the Defendant’s moving-on road in the direction of the right-hand side (the right-hand side) in the direction of the Defendant’s driving (the right-hand side).

The Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, destroyed and damaged the car in the above colon to cover approximately KRW 567,358 of the repair cost, but immediately stopped and left the site without taking necessary measures when a traffic accident occurs.

2. During the process of forging the signature of the company and signing the above investigation, the Defendant arrested the flagrant offender as a crime listed in paragraph (1) around 00:55 to 01:05 on the same day, and was transferred to the traffic safety guidance office of the Incheon Southern Police Station, the Defendant stated that he knows the personal information of E, who is a usual pro-friendly E, the confirmation letter of the arrest of the flagrant offender, the operator of the vehicle’s circumstantial statement report, the driver’s column of the main driver’s statement report, and the “E” in the column of the person who violated the notice letter of penalty payment, and submitted the above confirmation letter, etc. to the Chief F of the police station affiliated with the above police station as if they were duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising, forgees E's signature.

arrow