Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in driving a motor vehicle B, sod, sod.

On April 22, 2017, the Defendant came to turn to the left from the direction of the new engineer distance at the direction of the crime, where the direction distance of the crime at the border of the Gu, at the time of Ansan-si on April 22, 2017.

There is a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to traffic signals in such cases, since there is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got off the part of the victim C(55) driving at the direction of the malmal malgotima from the direction of the malmal marization by the negligence of entering the intersection in red mar, in violation of the signal, and received the part of the part of the victim C(55 malmnael in front of the malmalmal marn in front of the Defendant’s driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim C, such as catum salt in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the victim E (V, 59 years of age) who was on board the said taxi, for about seven weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following sentencing shall be considered as favorable to the Supreme Court);

1. Sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act - The imposition of sentence under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act - The defendant's negligence is serious, and the degree of injury of victims is significant, - favorable circumstances: the defendant reflects the defendant's mistake, and considerable damage caused by automobile insurance seems to have been restored, and the primary crime is