logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.08.21 2019나302891
용역비
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 13,880,000 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto from October 1, 2017 to August 21, 2019 against the Defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff entered into each service contract with the Defendant to perform the following services in relation to the construction, etc. of Gyeongdong-gun CFFFF CFFFFF in Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-do:

1) A service contract for the construction of a mushroom site on October 29, 2015 (1) (2) A service contract for the construction of a mushroom growing site. (3) A contract price: 7.5 million won (1.5 million won for the permit to occupy and use a ditch in the amount of KRW 6.6 million, 1.5 million for the permit to occupy and use a ditch in the amount of KRW 1.5 million, and a surcharge): A contract price for the construction of a building on January 14, 2016 (1) a service contract for the construction of a mushroom growing site on October 31, 2016 (4.3 million won + a permit to occupy and use a road plus 1.5 million won for the permit to divert a mountainous district: A contract price for the permission to divert a mountainous district, (2) a contract price for the additional construction work of KRW 3,000,000,000 for KRW 1.5 million for the permit to divert a mountainous district, and construction design.

B. On July 21, 2017, the Defendant obtained approval for the use of the said mushroom growing company from the Sungju-gun, and on August 18, 2017, the Plaintiff drafted a letter of payment with the purport that on August 18, 2017, the Plaintiff promises to fully pay the cost of various authorization and permission design services for the construction of the said mushroom growing company by September 30, 2017.

C. The Plaintiff is a person who was paid KRW 9 million out of the above service costs by the Defendant.

[Grounds for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entry of Gap1-6 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings]

2. The party's assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of claim, the defendant shall include value-added tax for the remaining service costs of 13,880,000 won + KRW 6,380,000 + KRW 3,300,000 + KRW 1,100,000 + KRW 3,850,000 + KRW 3,850,000 + KRW 9,000,000, and each service price of 3,850,000,000.

arrow