1. The Defendant’s KRW 96,80,000, and its annual 6% from July 26, 2014 to August 14, 2019, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that engages in urban planning, urban design research, technical services, etc., and the Defendant is a person who makes an architectural design in the name of “C”.

B. The Defendant and D’s design contract 1) On August 10, 2012, the Defendant concluded a design contract with the Defendant and D Co., Ltd. D (hereinafter “D”).

A project to create the F Park on the parcel outside Gyeonggi-gun E, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”).

(2) As to the contract amount of KRW 700,000,000,000, the contract amount of which is district unit planning, civil engineering and construction design (hereinafter “instant design contract”).

2) The method of payment of the contract amount stipulated in the design contract of this case is as follows.

Article 4 (Calculation of Consideration and Method of Payment) (2) The remuneration for the design business may be paid in lump sum or in installments.

(3) In principle, when the price is paid in installments, the time of payment and the amount to be paid shall be determined as follows, but D and the defendant may be adjusted through consultation:

When receiving deliberation on construction in KRW 30 210,000 at the time of receipt of the district unit planning of KRW 10,000,000 at the time of non-fixed-term contract of KRW 70,000 at KRW 10,000 at KRW 10,000 at the time of receipt of the project approval and construction permission of KRW 20,000 at the time of receipt of the project approval of KRW 140,000 at the time of delivery of KRW 140,000 at the time of implementation design supply of KRW 10,000 at KRW 10,000 at the time of receipt of the project plan of KRW 100,00 at the time of delivery of working design of KRW 100,000 at KRW 100

C. On October 29, 2012, the Defendant entered into a service contract with the Plaintiff and the Defendant with respect to the performance of the duty to propose district unit planning (urban management planning) and civil engineering design under the instant design contract with the Plaintiff on October 29, 2012 (hereinafter “instant service contract”).

AB concluded the agreement.

One page of the service contract of this case shall be 220,000,000 additional tax, and it shall be paid on the basis of the ratio according to the amount paid by the ordering agency under the terms of payment.

The cost of services shall be.