(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.19 2013구단4334

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.08.19 2013구단4334

전공상 추가상이처 불인정결정 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 9, 1973, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on September 14, 1976.

B. On April 17, 2001, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that “Isk (SIs) 5 resin deep spawn (SIs)” was different from the application, but the Defendant was judged in favor of the Defendant by filing a defect or administrative litigation, but was judged in a physical examination on the disability rating on March 31, 2004.

[hereinafter] The 5th spawn spawn spawn spawn (spawn spawn) of the 5th spawn.

On April 28, 2004, the Plaintiff applied for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant applied for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State: (b) the Defendant applied for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State; (c) the Defendant rendered a decision corresponding to the additional wound; (d) on October 26, 2007, the Defendant applied for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the following grounds: (a) the satise of the satise of the satise part of the satise; (b) the satise of the satise part of the satise; (c) the satise of the satise part of the satise; (d) the satise of the 5satise part of the satise; and (e) the remainder of the application is non-qualified

On March 29, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for confirmation of addition of major blue blue blue blue type (hereinafter “the instant injury”). However, after deliberation and resolution by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant recognized the Plaintiff as an official injury requirement on September 13, 2012, on the ground that there was no change of circumstance to reverse the existing resolutions, and that the instant difference is not recognized as having caused proximate causal relation with official duties, the Plaintiff rendered a decision of non-recognition of the address (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Grounds for recognition] Nos. 1, 2, and 2

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2015.10.23 2014구단1586

-대구고등법원 2016.05.27 2015누7150

-대전지방법원 2017.06.27 2016구단587

-광주지방법원 2014.03.21 2014고정190

-수원지방법원 2020.05.13 2019구단6875