beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and Defendant B are dismissed.
2. Of the appeal costs, the part relating to the Plaintiff’s appeal is the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or modification, such as “the addition or modification of 2. Additional” as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the
(Attachment of the judgment of the court of first instance shall not be deemed to have been cited in the attached Form 2.2. 2. 2. See 2. 14-16 . “The amount of the final construction work shall be 15,4560,000 won or more [the amount shall be added to the construction work equivalent to KRW 4,090,000 on May 10, 2017, and part of the household construction work shall be 7,9580,000 won (=15,4560,000 won - 7,840,000 won - 8,000 won)].”
- Of the 4th 17-20 parallels “6,609,000 won” (“66,509,000 won” - “81,831,900 won” - [6,568,800 won = 6,200,000 won (= 1,433,100 won) 11,40,400,000 won - KRW 120,000 (=179,580,000 for final construction - the amount of KRW 179,460,000 paid by the Plaintiff)];
5. Face 13 through 16 shall be deleted.
7 to 13 pages 7-13 - - - the Plaintiff does not have any evidence.
[Plaintiff’s assertion on November 9, 2018 that (i) waste disposal and cleaning expenses, (ii) household construction expenses, (iii) bluence display expenses, and (iv) other expenses (transporting expenses) should be recognized. However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone that each construction expenses of the remaining sequences, other than those recognized above, fall within the scope of the Defendants’ construction works under the instant contract under the instant contract. (iii) On July 2, 2019, the Plaintiff made a statement from the preparatory document dated 2, 2019 that the additional construction expenses of the evidence No. 6-2 of the evidence No. 6-2 were already included in the construction contents or were added arbitrarily without consultation with the Plaintiff, and the relevant work related to bluence display is written only in the aforementioned additional construction report, and each of the evidence No. 6-1, and 2.