logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.01.08 2019나73949
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this case by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition or modification as to “the addition or modification of 2. Additional” as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part added or amended is 2 pages 2, 13, and 13, respectively, to the Defendant.

2) On the 14-15th page 14-15, the instant lawsuit “(the instant previous lawsuit hereinafter referred to as the “instant lawsuit”)” is deemed to be “(the instant previous lawsuit hereinafter referred to as the “Usunam District Court Branch 2014Gahap206927, 2015Gahap3989, hereinafter referred to as the “instant lawsuit”).”

Then, “In addition, the Defendant filed a counterclaim to implement the procedure for cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the above neighboring mortgage, on the grounds that the obligation to return the above loan, which is the secured obligation of the Defendant, was extinguished due to set-off with the payment claim of the purchase price claim of the Defendant, on the ground that: “In addition, the Defendant, as seen above, filed a counterclaim to implement the procedure for cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the above neighboring mortgage.”

The 3rd parallel 6th parallel 3th parallel c is called “Defendant”.

The 3th page 14 is called as “a counterclaim or a counterclaim.”

The 5th 12th 12th 2th 7th 199 was the case in which the plaintiff filed a counterclaim or counterclaim.

The 5th page 13 referred to as “responsive” as “responsive or counterclaims.”

5.On the 16th page, "in relation to response" is added to the following:

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be rejected for reasons within the scope of the above recognition.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow