1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order.

Facts of recognition

The plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle B (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff vehicle"), and the defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle C (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant vehicle").

The outline of the instant accident is as follows.

On November 18, 2015, the date and time of the accident: On November 18, 2015, the accident scene of the third-lane road road at the inside circulation of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Hongdong: The defendant vehicle tried to change the course from the three-lane road to the two-lane road at the accident site to the two-lane road. The plaintiff vehicle at the later side of the defendant vehicle changed its course to the two-lane.

However, since the Plaintiff’s vehicle continues to change its course on the two-lanes as above, the Plaintiff’s vehicle entered a part of the one-lane and issued an accident that conflicts with other vehicles (motor vehicles) driving along the one-lane, causing damage to the Defendant’s vehicle.

On February 19, 2016, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 1,008,00 with the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

【The driver of any motor vehicle shall not change course when the driver of any motor vehicle who has the responsibility to compensate for damages in determining the purport of the statements and images of the two, three, four, and one of the motor vehicles in question intends to change course of the motor vehicle and it is likely to impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which the change is intended (Article 19(2) of the Road Traffic Act). On the other hand, the driver of any motor vehicle has the duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle closely with the right and the right and the right of

In full view of these legal principles, the outline of the instant accident recognized earlier, and the following specific circumstances recognized by this Court by the video of Gap 4, the defendant vehicle did not properly check the traffic situation of the two-lanes including the progress of the plaintiff vehicle.