logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.17 2017나32724
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claims extended by this court are all dismissed.

2. Demanding and expanding the costs of appeal.

Reasons

1.The following facts may be acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings, on the statements and images set forth in Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 and 2:

The plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle A (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff vehicle"), with respect to the vehicle B (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant vehicle").

B. On June 2, 2016, around 08:25, the Defendant’s vehicle proceeded along the two lanes of the third-lane road near Sungdong-dong, Seogdong-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and changed to the first lane, the front part of the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven in the same direction as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On July 5, 2016, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 4,876,00 at the cost of repairing the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

2. The driver of any motor vehicle who intends to change course of the motor vehicle shall not change the course when it is likely to impede the normal traffic of another motor vehicle running in the direction to which he/she intends to change (Article 19(3) of the Road Traffic Act). According to the facts recognized earlier, the defendant motor vehicle at the time of the accident in this case intends to change the vehicle from the two lanes to the one lane and enter the front part of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle, which is the front part of the motor vehicle, and the right side side of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle, conflict with the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the same case.

On the other hand, in light of the collision part of the original Defendant vehicle, the Defendant vehicle changes its vehicle line before it conflicts with the Plaintiff vehicle.

arrow