1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is the insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. At around 12:50 on June 27, 2016, the Defendant vehicle driven one lane on the second lane of the second lane in front of the shot 8-dong apartment complex located in Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-gu, U.S. and changed the vehicle into two lanes, and the left side of the Plaintiff vehicle driven on the two-lane in the same direction in the same direction in the same direction in the direction in the front direction of the Defendant vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

By July 21, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,453,200 as the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

【Ground of recognition】 Evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In light of the fact that the driver of any motor vehicle who intends to change course of a motor vehicle is likely to impede the normal traffic of another motor vehicle running in the direction to which the driver intends to change the course (Article 19(3) of the Road Traffic Act). In light of the fact that the driver of any motor vehicle at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at issue conflicts over the part adjacent to the left side of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle moving ahead of the right side of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the defendant at the time of the accident at issue, even though the distance with the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the defendant is not sufficiently secured, it seems that the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the defendant is unreasonable to change the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the plaintiff while moving adjacent to the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the motor vehicle of the

However, until before the change of the vehicle line between the plaintiff and the defendant vehicle, the plaintiff vehicle is proceeding behind the defendant vehicle.