beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On May 8, 2009, A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 8, 2009, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on May 23, 2010.
1. The Defendants’ act of forging his identity card with the Defendants, and the name influor of the Defendant A’s name influor of the crime of forging his identity card with the Defendants’ name influor and the name influor of the Defendant A, by soliciting the persons who requested the forgery of his identity card, including the Defendant B, via the Internet, to create a forged identification file with the clients’ photograph by using the computer Pool program, etc., and transmit the above file via the Internet Mesens. Defendant A, along with the clients’ personal information, delivery address, sales amount, etc. The Defendant A forged identification card by using the above forged identification card and image file transmitted by the Defendants’ name influor, and the clients’ personal information, etc., and then directly delivers the forged identification card to the clients, or by using Kwikju’s identification card and selling it with the Kwik Co. 130 to 150,000 won.
Defendant
B When the driver's license was revoked on March 14, 2013 due to a drunk driving, etc., B: (a) the driver's license was forged and carried with him; (b) the driver's license was sent via the Internet and mobile phone with his personal information and photograph files to the person in poor name via e-mail; and (c) the person in poor name requested the forgery of the driver's license; and (d) the person in poor name created an image file of a forged identification card, which attached the Defendant B's photograph by using the computer site program, etc. around that time; and (b) sent the file via Defendant B's personal information, delivery address, sales amount, etc.; and (c) the Defendant transmitted the file via Defendant B's Internet "softbsen". At that time, the above forgery was received from the person in poor name in the name at the 206 head office of the Gu Office