beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
A. The Jeonju District Court with respect to co-ownership of 100/180 of a 424m2 in Kim Jong-si.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On January 12, 1966, the registration of co-ownership shares of 100/180 of the land of this case was completed on April 28, 1965, and on March 14, 2012, on March 12, 2012, the registration of co-ownership transfer under Article 6085 of the receipt registration office of the Jeonju District Court Kim Jong-kon (hereinafter “instant first registration”) was completed.
B. As to the instant land No. 2, on August 25, 1981, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on November 25, 1969, and on March 14, 2012, on March 12, 2012, the registration of ownership transfer No. 6085 (hereinafter “the instant registration of transfer”) was completed on March 12, 2012.
C. Around December 18, 195, the Defendant: (a) newly constructed a building on the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case; (b) partially reconstructed it thereafter and owned the obstacles of this case in the present state; and (c) from December 18, 1995 to December 1 and 2 of this case’s closing date of argument.
The network E died on March 19, 2012, and the plaintiff, his wife, succeeded to 2/7 of the plaintiff, 3/7 of the F, and 2/7 of the G, his wife, respectively.
E. Since the gift which is the cause of the first and second transfer registration is null and void, there is no dispute between the parties that the first and second transfer registration of this case is null and void.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 9 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. 1) Determination of the Plaintiff’s claim for the cancellation of the registration Nos. 1 and 2 of the instant case is null and void. The Plaintiff is a co-owner of the instant No. 1 and 2 land as the deceased E’s heir, and is a co-owner of the instant land, seeking the cancellation of the entire registration of Nos. 1 and 2 of the instant case. The Defendant has a duty to respond to the claim. 2) As to the co-owned real estate in the name of a third party.