A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of the vehicle B.

No owner of a motor vehicle shall operate a motor vehicle on the road without mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, around 19:47 on June 11, 201, the Defendant operated the said vehicle, which was not covered by each mandatory insurance on the front road of the Cheongyang-dong bus stops in front of the Cheongyang-dong bus stops, and on February 26, 2012, around 12:34, 2012.

The written indictment contains the omission of the facts charged as to the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act of February 26, 2012 and stating that “the defendant operates the above vehicle over a total of two occasions, including the operation of the vehicle on the front of the passenger bus stop in front of the front of the passenger bus stop on June 11, 2011 (this seems to have been due to the omission of a list of crimes against the defendant in the written indictment). However, according to the evidence duly examined by this court, the defendant may be recognized as driving of each non-insurance vehicle on June 11, 201 and February 26, 2012. Accordingly, the defendant is led to confession from the investigative agency to this court. Thus, the criminal facts are specified as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the motor vehicle register Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the main sentence of Article 46 (2) and the main sentence of Article 8 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012) concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 37 and 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which had a record of criminal punishment more than the past 20 times, and among them, the Defendant operated a vehicle under the name of another person as stated in the facts constituting a crime, without mandatory insurance, even though he/she had a record of criminal punishment and suspended execution of imprisonment.

Therefore, it is true.