Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above punishment against the Defendants for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

(Criminal) On May 14, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for one year with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act at the former District Court's original branch on the grounds of the violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 22, 2015.

(Criminal) Defendant A is the representative of E Co., Ltd. in Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si, and Defendant B is the person who operated the said Co., Ltd. with Defendant A’s friendship with Defendant A’s friendship.

No person, other than a licensed administrative agent, shall engage in the business of providing consultation or advice on administrative-related Acts and subordinate statutes and administration, except as permitted by other Acts and subordinate statutes.

Despite the fact that the Defendants were not administrative agents, while operating the said stock company together, recruited to establish a lifelong education center on March 2012 with authorization and permission from the Office of Education, which is an administrative agency, and to receive a certain fee. On March 27, 2012, the Defendants received a request from F to establish a lifelong education center on March 27, 2012, and received a fee of KRW 30 million from F, and then received a request from the Office of Education, which is an administrative agency having jurisdiction over the Gyeonggi-si City, for the establishment and authorization and permission of a lifelong education center, and explained the F to prepare and receive the operation rules, location map, facility placement plan, facilities and equipment list, etc. from time to Nov. 5, 2013, the Defendants received the total amount of KRW 84 from the clients about 80,00,000 for the purpose of the establishment of a lifelong education center on March 20, 200.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H with respect to the police;

1. A copy of the details of H bank transactions;

1. The suspect A related to the establishment of the Education Center; and