logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.29 2018가단17385
건물명도등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. From 33,540,000 won and June 15, 2018

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 19, 2016, the Plaintiff agreed on May 19, 2016 to the Defendant that the lease contract may be terminated immediately if the Defendant delays the lease contract for at least three vehicles, on the following terms: (a) part (a) of 153 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “a store”) attached to the building drawing attached to the attached Table 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 3 in sequence: (b) lease deposit; (c) lease deposit; (d) one million won per rent month; and (e) lease period from June 14, 2016 to June 13, 2018.

B. Since July 10, 2017, the Plaintiff agreed to the Defendant that the lease contract may be terminated immediately if the Defendant fails to pay rent more than twice, on the following grounds: (a) the lease deposit of KRW 10 million; (b) the rent of KRW 1540,000 per month; and (c) the lease period of KRW 1540,000 from August 10, 2017 to August 9, 2019; and (b) the Plaintiff agreed that the lease contract may be terminated immediately if the Defendant fails to pay rent more than twice.

C. The Defendant is occupying and using the entire building of this case based on each of the above lease agreements.

(A) From April 14, 2017, the Defendant notified the Defendant that the store was not paid monthly rent from August 10, 2017 for (B) stores, and that on April 20, 2018, the Plaintiff would pay the Defendant each overdue charge until April 30, 2018, and if the said payment date is due, each of the above rental agreements will be terminated.

Nevertheless, the defendant does not pay the overdue rent.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts, each of the instant lease agreements on the instant building (a) and (b) was lawfully terminated on the grounds of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent.

(2) Accordingly, the defendant.

arrow