1. The request for intervention by an independent party intervenor shall be rejected;

2. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B, (1) Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, 7036.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 29, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) text 2.1 of the building totaling 21.6 square meters of the attached Form (Ga)(Ga)(Da (Ma)(Ma)(Ma)(hereinafter “instant building”) on the ground of F. 7 square meters, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 7036.7 square meters; and (b) order 2.1

(1) The part of (A) part of the building on board (hereinafter “store”) as indicated in paragraph (1) was leased to Defendant B with the following content:

(A) Lease deposit: 2 million won monthly rent: 300,000 won (payment on the 29th of each month): Special agreement for 12 months: the lessee shall be responsible for all the management expenses and management expenses of the lease price.

【G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”).

(b) includes management expenses required by it;

On April 2, 2013, the Plaintiff’s order No. 2-B among the instant buildings.

(1) The part of the building (B) and the part (c) of the building on board as indicated in paragraph (1) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “store”) were leased to Defendant C with the following content:

(A) Lease deposit: 6 million won: 12 months' monthly rent; 1 million won;

C. On April 17, 2018, the Plaintiff terminated each lease agreement on the grounds that the Defendants were in arrears for at least three occasions, and sent proof of the content that the Defendants were demanding the delivery of the store part with respect to Defendant B, and the store part with respect to Defendant C.

[However, the content certification of Defendant B (Evidence A6) stipulates that the period of overdue delay is from January 2018 to March 2018, but the content certification of Defendant C (Evidence A7) does not stipulate the period of overdue delay.

The Defendants sent the same content certificate to the Plaintiff on April 26, 2018 (Defendant B’s evidence No. 8, and Defendant C’s evidence No. 9). The main content is that the Defendants use the store according to the lease agreement with the Plaintiff on October 29, 2016, and the Plaintiff unfairly demanded the rent deposit and monthly rent increase around February 25, 2018.