A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in this case, the embezzlement of May 27, 201 among the facts charged in the instant case is acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

1. The embezzlement Defendant entered into a partnership business agreement with the victim C in which profits are distributed according to their shares by jointly managing the victim C and D, and around December 17, 2010, the Defendant purchased and sent the purchase price to the victim in China from the Chinese factory in the People's Republic of China by telephone to the victim in order to request the transfer of the purchase price, and then sent the purchase price to the victim 19,000 bills (Korean currency KRW 5,456,000) from the victim while being transferred to the victim and kept for the victim, and then then then he sent it only out to the victim. At around that time, the Defendant embezzled the purchase price of the rash printing machine with KRW 2,112,00, using it at will, and embezzled it at least KRW 9,972,00,000 for three times in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

2. Fraud;

A. On May 3, 2011, the Defendant called the victim to “after the medical device permission was granted, the Defendant sent medical supplies to the Chinese factory due to lack of personnel expenses, so that the Defendant could not send medical supplies.”

In fact, the defendant paid the Chinese factory personnel expenses with the investment funds of E at the time, and even if he received the money as personnel expenses from the victim, he did not intend to use it as personnel expenses.

On May 3, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 500,000 won from the bank account in the name of F to the bank account.

B. On September 20, 201, the Defendant called “a request for sending KRW 20 million from the test price to be produced and sent by November 20, 201” by phoneing the victim to the Chinese factory.

In fact, the Defendant was not equipped with the equipment such as gold-type equipment that can make the strings at the time, and even if the Defendant received KRW 20 million from the victim, there was no intention or ability to create the strings within the two months.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 20 million won from the victim to receive the remittance of the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;