logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지법 2003. 4. 29.자 2003브1 결정 : 확정
[상속포기][하집2003-1,94]
Main Issues

Whether a junior inheritor is entitled to waive his/her succession without waiting to lawfully accept a senior inheritor’s declaration of renunciation of succession (affirmative)

Summary of Decision

Since the period of care for an inheritor to file a declaration of renunciation of inheritance within 3 months from the date on which the commencement of inheritance becomes aware of the commencement of inheritance is established, the period of care for a junior inheritor should be calculated from the date on which the inheritor becomes his/her heir after his/her report of renunciation of inheritance was accepted as lawful, but as long as inheritance has commenced due to the death of the inheritee, each inheritor may file a declaration of renunciation of inheritance before his/her succession becomes effective simply because there are no legal grounds to restrict his/her right to choose acceptance and renunciation of inheritance in accordance with the above priority order of succession. Further, the legally accepted declaration of renunciation of inheritance by a senior inheritor is a natural premise for the refusal of the commencement of inheritance to himself/herself and cannot be viewed as a condition to prohibit the declaration of renunciation of succession because it is a natural premise for the refusal of succession by a junior inheritor to the effect of the declaration of renunciation of succession. Since the acceptance of the declaration of renunciation of succession can only be accepted after his/her refusal of succession, the acceptance of the declaration of renunciation of succession becomes effective after his/her refusal of succession.

[Reference Provisions]

[1] Articles 97, 1019(1), 1026 subparag. 2, and 1042 of the Civil Act

Appellant, appellant

Republic of Magkpo and 2 others

decedents;

Edives

The first instance decision

Incheon District Court Order 2002Ra1039 dated December 10, 2002

Text

The appellant's appeal is dismissed.

Purport of claim and appeal

The decision of the first instance shall be revoked. The applicant shall accept the report of renunciation of succession on November 4, 2002.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

According to the records, with the spouse and lineal ascendant and descendant of the inheritee, the non-claim-type heir of the first, second, second, the non-claim-type heir, Lee Jong-hee, Lee Sang-hoon, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "four non-claim-type heir") filed a report of renunciation of inheritance under the court 2002Ra618 on June 4, 2002, and the claimant filed a report of renunciation of inheritance under the court 2002Ra75 on July 25, 2002 as the claimant's lineal ascendant and descendant of the third-class heir, who was the third-class heir, and on August 23, 2002, the claimant filed a report of renunciation of inheritance on August 9, 202.

2. Chief;

The appellant’s report of renunciation of inheritance is null and void prior to the acceptance of the report of renunciation of inheritance by the subordinate claimant prior to the acceptance of the report of renunciation of inheritance by the senior non-party 4 in inheritance. As such, the claimant again accepted the report of renunciation of inheritance by the non-party 4 in the claim on November 4, 2002, and thereafter, the claimant filed the claim in this case with the intention to accept the valid return of succession.

3. Determination

4) Since the system is for the benefit of the heir 5) a week 16 to allow the heir to waive the succession within 3 months from the date on which the heir becomes aware of the commencement of succession (1) a week 5 to 4) a week 5 to 4) a week 5 to 6 weeks (16 weeks) a week 16 to 3) a week 10 to 14 a week (14) a week 16 to 16 a week 5 to 16 a week, each of which constitutes a waiver of succession (16 weeks) a week 5 to 3) a declaration of succession to 4) and a declaration of succession to 46 weeks a week 5 to 16 weeks a week 5 to 3) a declaration of succession to 36 weeks, each of which constitutes a waiver of succession to 4) and a declaration of succession to 23 weeks 25 to 3) a declaration of succession to the heir, each of whom constitutes a waiver of succession to the heir.

Therefore, as long as a prior inheritor’s report of renunciation of succession is accepted as legitimate and the claimant’s previous report of renunciation of succession is accepted as legitimate, the claimant’s previous report of renunciation of succession shall not be permitted to commence succession any longer to the claimant by the validity of the renunciation of succession, unless there are special circumstances of the special group, barring a week 76 a week 75 a week 76 a week 78 a week 79 a week 80 a week 81 a week 81 a week 70).

4. Conclusion

Therefore, the claim of this case, which is based on the premise that the waiver of inheritance has already been effective, is illegal and thus, it shall be dismissed. The decision of the court of first instance is just in conclusion and the appeal of the claimant is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Cho Young-chul (Presiding Judge)

(1) On April 14, 1998, the Plaintiff lent the same amount to the above East Shipbuilding on April 13, 2001, which was due date for payment, but the above East Shipbuilding failed to repay it. As such, on April 30, 2001, the Plaintiff extended the due date for payment by granting the loan by the so-called large exchange method as above.

2) The Defendants do not dispute the fact that the above gambling was in excess of their obligations at the time and the said disposal was deepened due to the above disposal.

3) The method of inserting the dys of cells by inserting them into the paper dys of dys of bar and then releasing them into the dys of bar and dys of dys of the dys of the dys of the dys

4) Article 2 (1) of the New York Convention provides that "all Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Act Amended by Presidential Decree No. 10000, 1900, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 300, 2000, 300,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,000,00.

5) Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act.

(6) On April 14, 1998, the Plaintiff lent the same amount to the above East Shipbuilding on April 13, 2001, which was due date for payment, but the above East Shipbuilding failed to repay it. As such, on April 30, 2001, the Plaintiff extended the due date for payment by granting the loan by the so-called large exchange method as above.

7) The Defendants do not dispute the fact that the above gambling was in excess of the obligation at the time and that the said dispositive act has deepened further.

8) The method of inserting the dys of cells by inserting the dys of injection in the paper dyste and dyeing them into the dye and then dyeing them into the dye and then printing them into the dye.

9) Article 2 (1) of the New York Convention provides that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement is all 'all mar dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife cife dife dife cife dife cife dife cife dife dife gife dife gife gife gife gife dife gife gife gife gife gife gife gife gife g.)'.

10) Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act.

Note 11) Supreme Court Order 91S1 dated June 11, 1991; Article 1021 of the Civil Act; Article 194(2) of the German Civil Act

12) On April 14, 1998, the Plaintiff lent the same amount to the above East Shipbuilding on April 14, 1998 on the due date for payment, but the above East Shipbuilding failed to repay it. As such, on April 30, 2001, the Plaintiff extended the due date for payment by granting the loan by the so-called large exchange method as above.

Note 13) The Defendants do not dispute the fact that the above gambling was in excess of their obligations at the time and the said disposal of the said dispositive act has deepened further.

Note 14) The method of inserting a dysom by inserting it into a paper dyste and shoting a cell into a dye and releasing it into a dye and then dyeing the dye and dyeing the dye.

15) Article 2 (1) of the New York Convention provides that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement is all 'all mar dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife d', 7 of the UNCITRAL's Standard International Trade Law dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife.

16) Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act

[17] Supreme Court Order 91S1 dated June 11, 1991; Article 1021 of the Civil Act; Article 194(2) of the German Civil Act

18) Article 997 of the Civil Act

19) On April 14, 1998, the Plaintiff lent the same amount to the above East Shipbuilding on April 13, 2001, but the above East Shipbuilding failed to repay it. As such, on April 30, 2001, the Plaintiff extended the repayment period by granting the loan by the so-called large exchange method as above.

Note 20) The Defendants do not dispute the fact that the above gambling was in excess of their obligations at the time and the said disposal of the said dispositive act has deepened further.

Note 21) The method of inserting the dys of cells by inserting them into a paper dyste and dyeing them into a dye and then dyeing them into a dye and then dyeing them into a dye.

22) Article 2 (1) of the New York Convention provides that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement is "all china dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife d', 7 of the UNCITRAL dife International Trade Law dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife" can be the subject matter of the arbitration agreement.

23) Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act

Note 24) Supreme Court Order 91S1 dated June 11, 1991; Article 1021 of the Civil Act; Article 194(2) of the German Civil Act

Note 25) Article 997 of the Civil Act

Note 26) Article 1026 Subparag. 2 of the Civil Act

(27) On April 14, 1998, the Plaintiff lent the same amount to the above dong Shipbuilding on April 14, 1998 on April 13, 2001, but the above dong-ship did not repay it. As the above dong-ship did not repay it, on April 30, 2001, the Plaintiff provided the loan by means of the so-called large exchange, so it was practically extended the repayment period.

Note 28) The Defendants do not dispute the fact that the above gambling was in excess of their obligations at the time and the said disposal of the said dispositive act has deepened further.

Note 29) The method of inserting a dysom by inserting it into a paper dyste and shoting a cell into a dye and releasing it into a dye and then dyeing the dye and dyeing the dye.

30) Article 2 (1) of New York Convention provides that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement is all 'all mar dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife d', 7 of UNCITRAL d's Standard International Trade Law dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife.

31) Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act

Note 32) Supreme Court Order 91S1 dated June 11, 1991; Article 1021 of the Civil Act; Article 194(2) of the German Civil Act

33) Article 997 of the Civil Act

Note 34) Article 1026 subparag. 2 of the Civil Act

Note 35)See Paragraph 1 of Article 1947 of the German Civil Code, Machen Komer, BGB EB Ebb, 309

36) On April 14, 1998, the Plaintiff lent the same amount to the above East Shipbuilding on April 13, 2001, but the above East Shipbuilding failed to repay it. As such, on April 30, 2001, the Plaintiff extended the repayment period by granting the loan by the so-called large exchange method as above.

Note 37) The Defendants do not dispute the fact that the above gambling was in excess of their obligations at the time and the above disposal of the dispositive act deepens more.

Note 38) The method of inserting the dys of cells by inserting them into a paper dyste and dyeing them into a dye and then dyeing them into a dye and then dyeing them into a dye.

39) Article 2 (1) of New York Convention provides that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement is all 'all mar dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife d', 7 of UNCITRAL d's Standard International Trade Law dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife.

40) Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act

Note 41) Supreme Court Order 91S1 dated June 11, 1991; Article 1021 of the Civil Act; Article 194(2) of the German Civil Act

42) Article 997 of the Civil Act

43) Article 1026 subparag. 2 of the Civil Act

Note 44)See Article 1947(1) of the German Civil Code, Article 1947(1), Machen Komer, BGB Ebb (197), 309.

Article 2142(1) of the German Civil Code explicitly provides that subordinate inheritors may waive inheritance upon the commencement of inheritance. Article 790 of the French Civil Code provides that subordinate inheritors may waive inheritance before the commencement of inheritance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1547, Apr. 1, 2007). The German Civil Code provides that a subordinate heir who has renounced inheritance may withdraw the succession and make a new absolute acceptance or a qualified acceptance unless the senior heir has granted a simple acceptance or a qualified acceptance prior to the senior heir (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1747, Apr. 1, 2007). In cases where inheritance qualifications vary like those of the deceased who were adopted by the deceased, the senior heir may choose approval and renunciation only once on the one-time basis of each inheritance status of the deceased, and that the senior heir may not be admitted to the previous heir's previous opinion or the previous heir's previous opinion on the acceptance of the succession after the renunciation of inheritance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 1608Hun-1).

46) On April 14, 1998, the Plaintiff lent the same amount to the above East Shipbuilding on April 13, 2001, which was due date for payment, but the above East Shipbuilding failed to repay it. As such, on April 30, 2001, the Plaintiff extended the due date for payment by granting the loan by the so-called large exchange method as above.

Note 47) The Defendants do not dispute the fact that the above gambling was in excess of their obligations at the time and the above disposal of the dispositive act deepens more.

Note 48) The method of inserting the dys of cells by inserting them into a paper dyste and dyeing them into a dye and then dyeing them into a dye and then dyeing them into a dye.

49) Article 2 (1) of New York Convention provides that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement is all 'all mar dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife d', 7 of UNCITRAL d's Standard International Trade Law dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife.

50) Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act

Note 51) Supreme Court Order 91S1 dated June 11, 1991; Article 1021 of the Civil Act; Article 194(2) of the German Civil Act

52) Article 997 of the Civil Act

53) Article 1026 subparag. 2 of the Civil Act

Note 54) refer to Paragraph 1 of Article 1947 of the German Civil Code, to paragraph 1 of Article 1947, to the Munchener, to Section BGB Ebb (197), and 309.

Article 2142(1) of the German Civil Code explicitly provides that subordinate inheritors may waive inheritance upon the commencement of inheritance. Article 790 of the French Civil Code provides that subordinate inheritors may waive inheritance after the commencement of inheritance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1547, Apr. 1, 2007). Article 790 of the French Civil Code provides that a subordinate heir who has renounced inheritance may withdraw the succession and make a new absolute acceptance or a qualified acceptance unless the senior heir has granted a simple acceptance or a qualified acceptance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1747, Apr. 2, 2007). In cases where inheritance qualifications vary like those of the inheritee adopted by the inheritee, the status of the inheritee can be determined only once by taking account of the overall acquisition of each share of inheritance, and that a senior heir may choose approval and renunciation by each inheritance qualification of the inheritee, and that a senior heir who has renounced succession may not be subject to prior approval or a qualified acceptance by the heir, even if not subject to prior approval or acceptance by the heir.

Note 56) Supreme Court Decision 2002Da21882 Delivered on November 8, 2002

(57) On April 14, 1998, the Plaintiff lent the same amount to the above East Shipbuilding on April 13, 2001, but the above East Shipbuilding failed to repay it. As such, on April 30, 2001, the Plaintiff extended the repayment period by granting the loan by the so-called large exchange method as above.

Note 58) The Defendants do not dispute the fact that the above gambling was in excess of their obligations at the time and the said disposal of the said dispositive act has deepened further.

Note 59) The method of inserting a dysom by inserting it into a paper dyste and shoting a cell into a dye and releasing it into a dye and then dyeing the dye and dyeing the dye.

60) Article 2 (1) of New York Convention provides that the subject matter of the arbitration agreement is all 'all mar dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife d', 7 of UNCITRAL d's Standard International Trade Law dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife dife sife dife dife d'.

Note 61) Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act

Note 62) Supreme Court Order 91S1 dated June 11, 1991; Article 1021 of the Civil Act; Article 194(2) of the German Civil Act

63) Article 997 of the Civil Act

Note 64) Article 1026 Subparag. 2 of the Civil Act

Note 65)See Paragraph 1 of Article 1947 of the German Civil Code, Machen Komer, BGB EB Ebb, 309

Article 2142(1) of the German Civil Code explicitly provides that subordinate inheritors may waive inheritance upon the commencement of inheritance. Article 790 of the French Civil Code provides that subordinate inheritors may waive inheritance before the commencement of inheritance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1547, Apr. 1, 2007). The German Civil Code provides that a subordinate heir who has renounced inheritance may withdraw the succession and make a new absolute acceptance or a qualified acceptance unless the senior heir has granted a simple acceptance or a qualified acceptance prior to the senior heir (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1747, Apr. 1, 2007). In cases where inheritance qualifications vary like those of the deceased who were adopted by the deceased, the senior heir may choose approval and renunciation only once on the one-time basis of each inheritance status of the deceased, and that the senior heir may not be admitted to the previous heir's previous opinion or the previous heir's previous opinion on the acceptance of the succession after the renunciation of inheritance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Hun-1).

See Supreme Court Decision 2002Da21882 decided Nov. 8, 2002

Note 68) Article 1042 of the Civil Act

69) On April 14, 1998, the Plaintiff lent the same amount to the above East Shipbuilding on April 13, 2001, but the above East Shipbuilding failed to repay it. As such, on April 30, 2001, the Plaintiff extended the repayment period by granting the loan by the so-called large exchange method as above.

Note 70) The Defendants do not dispute the fact that the above gambling was in excess of their obligations at the time and the above disposal of the said dispositive act has deepened more.

Note 71) The method of inserting the dys of cells by inserting them into the dys of paper by inserting them into the dys of paper and then releasing them into the dys of dys and then printing them into the dys of dys of paper.

Article 2 (1) of the New York Convention provides that "all Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Act ("New York") may be subject to arbitration agreement, and Article 7 of the UNCITRAL Act ("UNFCCC") provides that "all Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Act ("New York") may be subject to arbitration agreement, and that "the Standard International Trade Act ("UNFCCC") shall be subject to arbitration agreement" ("UNFCCC") of the UNCITRAL. Article 7 of the UN Committee on International Trade and Trade ("UNFCCC") shall also be subject to arbitration agreement. The expression "Nay" or "Cerin" may be subject to arbitration agreement if it is "a certain legal relationship."

Note 73) Article 1019(1) of the Civil Act.

Note 74) Supreme Court Order 91S1 dated June 11, 1991; Article 1021 of the Civil Act; Article 194(2) of the German Civil Act

Note 75) Article 997 of the Civil Act

Note 76) Article 1026 subparag. 2 of the Civil Act

Note 77) refer to Paragraph 1 of Article 1947 of the German Civil Code, to paragraph 1 of Article 1947, to the Munchener, to Section BGB Ebb (197), and 309.

Article 2142(1) of the German Civil Code explicitly provides that subordinate inheritors may waive inheritance upon the commencement of inheritance. Article 790 of the French Civil Code provides that subordinate inheritors may waive inheritance after the commencement of inheritance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1477, Apr. 1, 2007). Article 790 of the French Civil Code provides that a subordinate heir who has renounced inheritance may withdraw the succession and make a new absolute acceptance or a qualified acceptance unless the senior heir has granted a simple acceptance or a qualified acceptance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1747, Apr. 2, 2007). In cases where inheritance qualifications vary like those of an inheritee adopted as a person of the inheritee, the status of an inheritee can be determined only once by taking account of the acquisition of all shares of inheritance, and that the senior heir may choose approval and renunciation by each inheritance qualification of the deceased, and that the senior heir may not be selected by the first two Japanese Civil Code in the case of a person’s refusal of inheritance.

See Supreme Court Decision 2002Da21882 decided Nov. 8, 2002

80) Article 1042 of the Civil Act

Note 81) Article 1024(2) of the Civil Act.

arrow