beta
Text
The defendant's KRW 1,00,000 and each of the above amounts to the plaintiffs are 5% per annum from October 12, 2018 to February 12, 2020.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Status 1) The defendant is the E High School located in Busan Shipping Daegu D (hereinafter "the school of this case").
(2) Plaintiff C (FF) is a student who was enrolled in the third and seventh grade of the instant school around 2018 and graduated from the school around February 2019, and Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B are the parents of Plaintiff C.
3) G is a student who was enrolled in the third grade 7 of the instant school with the Plaintiff C, and H is a teacher in the office of Plaintiff C and G. B. The occurrence of school violence case 1) around October 12, 2018 (goldday) and in the first grade class of the instant school, the Plaintiff C and G dialogueed with the Plaintiff C in the third grade 7 class of the instant school, and the Plaintiff C was in a situation where the appraisal was not good for the Plaintiff C to the effect that “the ordinary people (G was not good, and the day was the birth of that day)” (the name of the Plaintiff C) was used to mean “I” (the same shall apply to the Plaintiff C’s name) at the Internet community site, etc.
2) On the same day, students were under the supervision of the J of the educational teacher in the above classroom at the fifth intersection of the same day. G was under the supervision of the Plaintiff’s school teacher in the above classroom at the fifth intersection of the same day. While the Plaintiff and C were suffering from the Plaintiff’s wound, the Plaintiff stated that the Plaintiff C was “the ordinary people” again, and the Plaintiff C was able to have his head and back part of the Plaintiff C’s left-hand head and back part 6 times due to his drinking (hereinafter “the first assault”).
2) A teacher J had a witness, a large sound, sees the above sound, and sees the above sound, and made the Plaintiff C come away from the front of the corridor. After the locking, the Plaintiff C was able to take away from the front of the corridor. The Plaintiff C appears to be true to a certain extent after the locking, and the teacher K returned to the next half. The teacher J respondeded to the purport that the Plaintiff C was fine, but the Plaintiff C was a fine for negligence. 3)