logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.07.12 2018고단1691
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 8, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury), violation of Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and violation of Road Traffic Act (driving without a driver’s license) led the Defendant to drive the 321CC Tratob in the state of under the influence of alcohol of 0.094% in blood while under the influence of alcohol of 01:40 on April 8, 2018, while driving the 321CC Tratoba, which is owned by the Defendant, and drive the intersection of C pharmacy in front of the C pharmacy located in the area B of Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

Since there is a place where a signal, etc. has been installed, the person engaged in driving duty has a duty to pay attention to prevent accidents from being caused by safely driving under the new code.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the Eone Star of the victim D (39 S, south) driving, which entered the intersection from the left side of the proceeding direction by negligence of driving in violation of vehicle red signal at the intersection, to the right side, and received the above part of the right side of the defendant's driving as the front part.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered from the victim F (F) who was on the part of the Defendant’s driver’s off-to-air, approximately 6 weeks of care, such as kidne fever, kidne column, etc., and this part of this part, from the victim D who driven the said Lone Star bicycle, the injury of chills, tensions, etc. in need of approximately 2 weeks of care to the victim G (F) who was on the said fluor of the said fluor, for approximately 43 years of age, to the victim G (F) who was on the fluor of the said fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fla

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act: (a) the Defendant operated the Haba Haba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each of D, F, G, H, and I.

arrow