logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.11 2017고정1570
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Daegu District Court No. 31 located in Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 364, Daegu-gu, and was present at the Daegu District Court No. 2016, Jan. 27, 2016, Daegu District Court No. 2012-C, No. 1274, Jan. 27, 2016, and gave testimony.

After the Defendant took an oath as a witness as above, the Defendant testified to the effect that “C only resisted to the doctor on the ground that the physician would have a waiting time for treatment while waiting in the treatment room No. D8 B and D on January 27, 2016, and did not look at the doctor, and rather, the doctor E would rather be said to be another hospital while the chest was taken as a drinking by C.”

However, on January 27, 2016, the Defendant testified that C had a doctor's chest on the ground that C had a waiting time for medical treatment in D8 stories and 5 treatment rooms located in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, and there was no doctor E in case of C.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G (the statements of the above witness on the grounds, etc. for which the violence was committed may be substantially detailed and reliable to the extent that the statements are consistent, contradictory to each other, and are considerably detailed to the extent that they cannot be known without experience);

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Application of the provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes (No. 4 times), copies of each protocol of public trial (E, G), copies of each protocol of examination of a witness, each recording book (E, G), text of the judgment (No. 1274 of the High Court Decision 2016) and text of the judgment (No. 2017No. 880);

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow