The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On February 27, 2018, the Defendant was waiting for the receipt of children’s three-story D of the C point C point C located in the G point C point B in the G point C point C point in the G point C point in the G point C point in the G point C point in the G point C point in the G point C point in the G point C point in the G point in the G point in the charge of the charges, and the Defendant rejected it and interfered with the operation of the hospital for about 15 minutes by force for other patients, not for about 15 minutes.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant asserts that, although there was a change in the order of medical treatment, he/she raised an objection, he/she did not interfere with his/her business by force because he/she did not saw or leave the clinic.

B. The evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case has each legal statement of witness E, F and G.

The witnesses stated in this Court as follows.

1 Medical Doctor E working in the medical clinic, "A defendant was unable to play a sound outside of the medical clinic, and was fluently fluent with a nurse.

The defendant's entry into the medical room and without hearing E explanation of the order of medical treatment, the hospital's wrong recognition has been made.

The Defendant recommended that “I will correct and re-enter the treatment without any medical treatment. I will do so.” The Defendant did not leave the Defendant, and the Defendant saw “I will see, I will,” and “I will,” “I will,” respectively.

The voice of the defendant was the most important thing.